Timeline for Are Scholarly Answers About Judaism On-Topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2022 at 21:57 | comment | added | user18041 | @DoubleAA: Kindly delete my last two comments, on this post's main comment section; thank you. | |
| Nov 24, 2020 at 8:08 | answer | added | N.T. | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 19, 2020 at 18:02 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Nov 18, 2020 at 6:02 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 12, 2020 at 22:23 | answer | added | b a | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 10, 2020 at 14:00 | comment | added | kouty | I think there are many scholar answers in the site. Many users are more scholar than yeshivish. There are also modern orthodox people that quote doctors and professors | |
| Nov 10, 2020 at 1:27 | comment | added | Alex | All your extant answers combined have but one downvote. I can't speak to your deleted answers though. | |
| Nov 10, 2020 at 0:54 | comment | added | user18041 | @DoubleAA: I did not define it, nor am I aware of any other better term for the concept, nor have I failed to provide an explanation for its meaning in my original question. | |
| Nov 10, 2020 at 0:34 | comment | added | Double AA Mod | You can define terms however you want. I'm suggesting you use different terminology to avoid any offensive implications. | |
| Nov 10, 2020 at 0:19 | comment | added | user18041 | @DoubleAA: As already pointed out in my second paragraph, I am speaking about applying the scholarly method, not about one's expertise or erudition in a certain field of knowledge, which is how the examples you provided seem to employ the term. | |
| Nov 9, 2020 at 21:37 | comment | added | Double AA Mod | think of a how a student of kabbala who learned a lot may eventually also consider himself a scholar. Are all these posts wrong judaism.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22torah+scholar%22 | |
| Nov 9, 2020 at 21:34 | comment | added | user18041 | @DoubleAA: It is hard for me to think of specific examples. And no, why would it be offensive ? Think, for instance, of how a scholar might approach the same topic differently than, say, a mystic, or a student of the Kabbala. | |
| Nov 9, 2020 at 21:04 | comment | added | Double AA Mod | To be clear all your deleted answers were deleted by you (except one which had zero votes and was deleted when its question was deleted for other reasons). No mods or other users have deleted answers for being too "scholarly" (AFAICT) | |
| Nov 9, 2020 at 21:00 | comment | added | Double AA Mod | The implication that faith-based answers aren't scholarly is probably offensive to many, no? Can faith-based answers not provide factual, objective, and (hopefully) informative approaches? Maybe pick other words to describe what you are trying to describe. | |
| Nov 9, 2020 at 18:54 | history | asked | user18041 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |