Timeline for Better to post an answer with no source, or not to post at all?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.judaism.stackexchange.com/ with https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.judaism.stackexchange.com/ with https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 9, 2015 at 3:34 | comment | added | Monica Cellio Mod | @SAH it looks like this proposal didn't get much support from the community, so don't take this as policy. It was a suggestion. (Isaac's and my answers have the most support right now, and I've answered a related question on my post.) | |
| Dec 8, 2015 at 22:34 | comment | added | SAH | @DoubleAA Are we still allowed to do this in the comments section? | |
| Feb 22, 2012 at 4:55 | comment | added | Double AA Mod | @Yirmeyahu Just because the system allows for multi-part discussions doesn't mean it is helped by clutter. If you have a different answer, post it! But we don't need multiple versions of the same thing. | |
| Feb 22, 2012 at 4:47 | comment | added | Yirmeyahu | I believe your points would be much more relevant if this were a Wiki project rather than one where the community votes on the best answer. | |
| Feb 22, 2012 at 4:26 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | +1. That's an important distinction that I missed in my answer. | |
| Feb 22, 2012 at 4:06 | comment | added | Double AA Mod | I assume throughout that concerns for reputation are negligible. That is general SE policy AKAIK. | |
| Feb 22, 2012 at 4:04 | history | answered | Double AAMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |