How effective is the weekly topic challenge proposal in generating new questions?
Is there any way of measuring or estimating this?
The topic challenge ran continuously from 5772-03 (November 2, 2011) to 5772-23 (March 21, 2012). It was then briefly resumed from 5772-40 (June 18, 2012) to 5772-43 (July 24, 2012). For the purposes of this analysis, I'm going to focus on the 20 weeks from November to March and compare them to the previous 20 weeks (baseline
) and the following 20 weeks (next
). I'm using this query, which is the same type of data I used to analyze a contest for Parenting.SE.
q_type askers questions answers q_edits a_edits q_votes a_votes q_comments a_comments touches_per_q
-------- ------ --------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------- ---------- -------------
baseline 126 785 1811 1732 1163 5974 8406 2129 3796 31.86
contest 141 1102 2287 2481 1520 8391 10850 4264 6441 32.88
next 189 937 1593 2197 1199 6088 6966 4835 4625 29.35
As you can see, the first contest period had 317 more question than the previous period and 165 more than the next period. (Note: the next period overlapped with the other contest period.) The increase in askers from 126 to 141 to 189, suggests that more people were using the site in each successive time period. Assuming a rising tide, we can still estimate that the contest added a little over 8 questions a week. This seemed too many, so I tabulated the results of each contest as reported in the meta answers:
7: Weekly topic challenge 5772-03 (week of Lech-l'cha 5772): aliya laaretz
23: Weekly topic challenge 5772-04 (week of Vayera 5772): Shabbat songs
18: Weekly topic challenge 5772-05 (week of Chaye Sara 5772): Navi: books of the prophets
4: Weekly topic challenge 5772-06 (week of Tol'dos 5772): Ribbis: loans at interest
5: Weekly topic challenge 5772-07 (week of Vayetze 5772): Shidduchim: finding a spouse
4: Weekly topic challenge 5772-08 (week of Vayishlach 5772): Asked by children
18: Weekly topic challenge 5772-09 (week of Vayeshev 5772): Chanukah
4: Weekly topic challenge 5772-10 (week of Miketz 5772): Commentaries
4: Weekly topic challenge 5772-11 (week of Vayigash 5772): Violence
2: Weekly topic challenge 5772-12 (week of Vaychi 5772): Ikkarei Emunah: Fundamentals of Belief
3: Weekly topic challenge 5772-13 (week of Sh'mos 5772): Korbanot
5: Weekly topic challenge 5772-14 (week of Vaera 5772): Midrashim and Aggadot
3: Weekly topic challenge 5772-15 (week of Bo 5772): Kishuf (Magic)
3: Weekly topic challenge 5772-16 (week of B'shalach 5772): Light
3: Weekly topic challenge 5772-17 (week of Yisro 5772): Trees
4: Weekly topic challenge 5772-18 (week of Mishpatim 5772): Unusual Blessings
1: Weekly topic challenge 5772-19 (week of T'ruma 5772): Practical Kabbalah
1: Weekly topic challenge 5772-20 (week of T'tzave 5772): Yevamot
1: Weekly topic challenge 5772-21 (week of Ki Sisa 5772): Medieval Jewish History
2: Weekly topic challenge 5772-22-23 (week of Vayakhel-P'kude 5772): Pets
2: Weekly topic challenge 5772-24 (week of Vayikra 5772): colors
6: Weekly topic challenge 5772-25 (week of Tzav 5772): Book division
Adding those up, I get 125 contest questions (or just over 6 a week). So we saw more questions than just those asked in response to the contest. This suggests that the contest is purely additive and perhaps even slightly multiplicative. It's also clear that interest in the contests waned toward the end of the period.
Here's a quick look at the second contest period:
q_type askers questions answers q_edits a_edits q_votes a_votes q_comments a_comments touches_per_q
-------- ------ --------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------- ---------- -------------
baseline 71 246 433 598 332 1712 2078 1412 1328 32.09
contest 80 272 428 647 340 1622 1636 1412 1244 26.94
next 75 255 429 571 310 1372 1588 1347 1226 26.84
The results of this shorter period are incomplete:
2: Weekly topic challenge 5772-40: Pirkei Avot
?: Weekly topic challenge 5772-41 (week of Pin'chas 5772): Rashi
?: Weekly topic challenge 5772-42-43 (week of Matos-Mas'e 5772): grains
The statistics suggest that 17 extra questions were asked as a result of the contest (though I don't know if that's statistically significant).
Finally, here are the statistics for the entire period from November 2, 2011 to July 24, 2012 compared to the equivalent proceeding and following weeks:
q_type askers questions answers q_edits a_edits q_votes a_votes q_comments a_comments touches_per_q
-------- ------ --------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------- ---------- -------------
baseline 186 1449 3515 2871 2007 9907 15959 3463 6826 30.74
contest 249 1923 3694 4407 2574 13856 17192 8468 10535 31.58
next 335 1972 3055 4060 2014 8850 10969 8669 8008 23.14
I wouldn't say this is definitive evidence that the contests drove questions since the next period improved upon the contest period. But the statistics proved, when combined with the data above, supporting evidence that contests drove engagement of various types. It would also seem that artificially inflating question rate caused no particular harm in terms of letdown or distraction.