Can one downvote an answer that is itself mediocre to promote the next answer?

This is especially relevant on inactive questions where any difference in upvotes is mostly going to stay that way. If one answer is much better than the above answer, one may need to combine a downvote on the above, with an upvote on the top.

  • 1
    This is especially-especially relevant on late answers to inactive questions. Usually someone goes to the trouble to answer such questions because his or her answer is much better than all the others. Often it languishes there at the bottom with +1 if its lucky.
    – mevaqesh
    Commented Aug 24, 2015 at 21:10

2 Answers 2


You should vote on answers independent of how many votes it has and independent of the content and quality of any other answer.


As far as general SE policy is concerned, you are entitled to downvote whatever you want for whatever reasons you choose, but targeted downvoting is not allowed. However, policy is different from the generally agreed upon etiquette of the site, and the generally agreed upon etiquette is that you should downvote answers that are incorrect, incomplete, incomprehensible, or don't answer the question asked. But since voting is private, you can do whatever you want, as long as you don't target a specific user or group of users and arbitrarily downvote them (the system automatically detects targeted voting patterns and reverses the votes in question; the user responsible for the votes may be suspended or banned for the irregularities).

Meta SE FAQ Recommendations for Downvoting Answers:

Try to comment whenever applicable when downvoting.

[Reasons to downvote]

  • Does not answer the question. Flag at your discretion.

  • Makes no sense

  • FGITW [Fastest gun in the West, i.e., submitting an inferior or incomplete answer as quickly as possible just to beat everyone else to the punch] post with minimal answer: This depends upon the answer really.

  • Link-only answer

  • Is wrong (in your opinion).

Do NOT downvote just because:

  • It's a competitor. Voting is for post quality, and you end up harming the system. Also, upvoting competing answers gets you something shiny.

  • Again, grammar that does not affect comprehensibility too much.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .