Pretty self-explanatory. Is the fact that is more specific than enough of a reason to keep them apart?

  • @elikakohen There's aramaic, but there's no chaldean. As you can see below, the question was also asked of english. – DonielF Aug 29 '16 at 20:26
  • ... Sorry, I meant that there may also be questions regarding Aramaic, or Chaldean - that would be distinct from "Language". – elika kohen Aug 29 '16 at 20:28

Both English and Hebrew have sufficiently many questions on Mi Yodeya about them in their own right that it makes sense to maintain tags for each of these.

  • Fair enough for english, but most of the hebrew questions, even the ones left open, seem to do more with Hebrew Language than Hebrew as it pertains to Yiddishkeit. – DonielF Aug 24 '16 at 19:43
  • @DonielF If there are open questions that you think ought to be closed, there's a process for that. I submit that even if you closed all of the hebrew questions that the scope-strictest around here would object to, you'll still have very many questions rightfully tagged hebrew. This is not at all surprising, given the many ways in which the Hebrew language is important to Judaism. – Isaac Moses Aug 24 '16 at 19:54
  • Fair enough. (Note I can't vote to close other people's questions, but that's an aside.) So...do we just let this question die out now? – DonielF Aug 24 '16 at 20:25
  • @DonielF It's up to the community to vote on this question and its answers. If you consider this answer dispositive, you can signal as much by marking it "accepted." – Isaac Moses Aug 24 '16 at 20:28
  • @DonielF You will soon enough! In the mean time don't forget to flag for closure, as that sends the question to the eyes of other high rep users who can vote on it. – Double AA Aug 25 '16 at 2:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .